My initial reaction to the #OccupyWallStreet protests is this: Our public schools are failing many of our kids.
This is not new and I’m not the first to say it. People know that to compete in a global, information-based and technological economy, education is more important than ever. Our nation has a huge mismatch of available labor skills and needed labor skills.
When I hear some of the protesters speak, I feel they don’t have the full set of tools — the language, even — to express themselves. They don’t know how the system works. And it’s ridiculous that they don’t, because the capital markets are ruled by some basic concepts that are not that difficult to teach.
(Here’s a start: The economic collapse of 2008 and 2009, from which we’re still reeling, was caused by too much debt. Did Wall Street play a major role in buying and selling that debt? Sure thing. Did consumer banks and mortgage lenders make loans to people who shouldn’t have gotten them? Yes. Could they have done it without borrowers? Nope. Would they have done it without government tax incentives and policies that promoted home-ownership, which guided capital to flow into mortgage debt, versus other types? Probably not. Read Michael Lewis’s The Big Short to learn more.)
It’s ridiculous that kids memorize the dates that Confucius lived but don’t learn a thing about consumer credit or compound interest.
One colleague recently told me that his grade school taught him weaving and knots. He didn’t learn the concept of supply and demand until after college. (What economy was he being prepared for?)
When I was in grade school, I learned the difference between a mitochondria and a ribosome. I couldn’t have told you one thing about debt or equity, a bond or a stock.
Don’t get me wrong — I love science, I love art, I love that my public school exposed me to Toni Morrison and Chaucer — I think these things are important, but there’s got to be a way to fit economics in.
Economics is the study of incentives, of money supply and flow, of consumption, of economies.
This economics stuff matters. Even if the Wall Street protesters don’t fully understand the system, they know it affects them. Because it does.
Business makes the world go around. And it can be richly taught. I took my first macro-economics as an honors colloquium, 15 students in an intimate group with a real economist. But the fun came in micro-economics. I had a high-energy professor — we did exercises on buying and selling, we were all to be “goods” in the market selling our labor, we played games that illustrated incentives. I never looked at a consumer product price tag in the same way again.
Earlier this year, I guest-lectured on business journalism 101 at a local university. The college kids, who are self described non-math types, got a lot out of it. For many, it was their first exposure to anything financial.
One student approached me after my talk and said, “When my boss cut back my hours at the coffee shop, he said that coffee bean costs were rising. I was like, ‘What does that have to do with me?’ I feel like I understand that now.”
Bingo! I’m sorry her hours were cut, I’m thrilled that she better understands how a drought in South America affects her personally. She figured it out after just 20 minutes of learning the principles of an income statement.
This isn’t a post that’s meant to blame or shame. I just think we should arm kids with the tools they need.
Financial literacy is an important tool.
For some great commentary on public education, check out this interview with the late Steve Jobs.
— ### —
If you liked this post, you might like:
Simplicity gains momentum, but at what cost?
Finding “meaning” in the for-profit realm
Simple life lessons: Following a leadership pattern
The world didn’t end. What did you learn?
Maybe you are good at math and never knew it
Are you secretly good at math? Five more clues
A tribute to biology, which bugs me
Five ways to lead a more analytic life
Politics is just politics, not citizenship nor community
A paradox of modern life: Comfort is a noose
The world economy in 10 seconds
Why the passage of time confounds us
Applying Wall Street logic to your life
Are universities the next bubble to burst?
Don’t be paralyzed by imperfection
Halls of Congress <= Halls of Hogwarts
Maximize the moment. And jump.
Yes! I love your new design. Much cleaner and simpler.
My friends are starting a company to address this issue. Their focus is more on personal finance than macroeconomics, but I believe these themes are connected. The company is AgentPiggy.com and I am a contributor to the blog.
Could I interview you about how YOU learned about money as a child, and how it has shaped your financial history and career path? I think it would be super interesting 🙂
Leslie: Wow, what a great idea!
Check it out folks: http://agentpiggy.com/
I agree on the new design & such an interesting post. I would have loved to have taken that micro colloquium (& attended your guest lecture!).
To underscore your point on the importance of studying econ, from the NYT editorial on Nobel: “Economics, at its best, is a set of ideas and methods for the improvement of society..The impacts of policy choices can be modeled and discussed, as can the consequences of failing to act.” (http://nyti.ms/pWENua) & I think you would agree w/ this NYT op-ed last Aug. “How To Fix Our Math Education” http://nyti.ms/qbmP0I.
“For instance, how often do most adults encounter a situation in which they need to solve a quadratic equation? Do they need to know what constitutes a “group of transformations” or a “complex number”? Of course professional mathematicians, physicists and engineers need to know all this, but most citizens would be better served by studying how mortgages are priced, how computers are programmed and how the statistical results of a medical trial are to be understood…”
Thank you for these links!
I’d missed the story about the 2011 Nobel in Economics.
And YES — I’m with you on the math education reform.
I might be from the UK, and therefore have no idea what’s going on with the Occupy Wall Street thing (though I’m well aware that I should), but I completely agree with all the points you make here. I agree that economics should be taught to everyone, not just those that decide to take it when they reach sixth form/college as it affects us all and the fact that the majority of us don’t understand half of what’s happening is simply fuel to ensure that it will happen again and again.
Tamara: Welcome and thanks for agreeing with me. 🙂